Categorized | Featured, News

I blame police sex ring for conspiracy of silence over the Dunblane massacre

Posted on 05 June 2005 by admin


Page: 15

POLICE were involved in a paedophile ring that covered up abuse allegations against the man responsible for the Dunblane school massacre, it was claimed last night.

The astonishing claim is being made by former paramedic Sandra Uttley, who is going to the European Court of Human Rights to demand a new inquiry into the tragedy.

Sixteen children and their teacher were shot dead by Thomas Hamilton in March 1996 after he burst into their school gym and fired at random as the youngsters began an exercise class. The attack prompted tighter gun controls in the UK.

Miss Uttley alleges that Lord Cullen’s inquiry into the massacre was fatally flawed because crucial evidence was withheld from it.

The 45-year-old, who dealt with the aftermath of the killings in her job as a paramedic, said: ‘There are glaring anomalies in the inquiry – inconsistencies in witness testimony, incorrect information given on oath and the absence of vital witnesses.

‘It is also blatantly obvious that Central Scotland Police, who were chosen to investigate the background to the murders, should never have been involved in a so-called independent inquiry.

‘They were implicated in the events under scrutiny and continually provided Hamilton with renewals of his gun licence despite long-term and repeated warnings that this should not happen. It was known that Hamilton had friends in the police force, including one highly placed officer.

‘Lord Cullen read none of the preparatory material before the inquiry. That material has now been sealed and locked away for 100 years despite the public never having had the chance to see those documents.

‘I believe that Hamilton was a major provider of pornographic photographs and videos to a ring of men prominent in Central Scotland, including police officers who protected him from numerous allegations of physical abuse at boys’ camps and clubs he ran.

They protected themselves after the massacre which conveniently ended in his suicide. Going to Europe is my only hope that the truth will finally be heard. I believe there are more people who should be brought to justice.’

Miss Uttley is asking the court to rule that, as a former Dunblane resident, her rights have been breached because the inquiry was not independent, transparent or effective.

The existence of the secret dossier of evidence which was withheld from the Cullen inquiry was first reported by The Mail on Sunday two years ago. Held at the National Archives in Edinburgh, the 106 documents reveal why prosecutors failed to bring the gunman to court before the massacre despite more than 20 complaints, mostly about his running of sports clubs and a summer camp at Loch Lomond in 1991.

The existence of the report was mentioned at the inquiry but never seen. In fact, Lord Cullen ruled in favour of a motion that the prosecutors who decided not to take legal proceedings against Hamilton should not have to justify their decision.

Among the sealed documents is a report revealing that a senior prosecutor ordered pictures of semi-naked children, seized as evidence before the tragedy, to be returned to Hamilton. Others link the gunman to the Freemasons.

Last year Miss Uttley’s former partner, Mick North, whose fiveyearold daughter Sophie was killed by Hamilton, said he was ‘convinced’ of a cover-up.

Miss Uttley added: ‘It is my firm belief that the truth has not come out and there has been a total cover-up to protect a number of people. Europe is my last hope.’

A spokesman for Central Scotland Police said: ‘It would be inappropriate for us to make any comment at this time.’ Detective Chief Superintendent John Ogg, who headed the Dunblane investigation, has said of criticism in the past: ‘I can reassure you that the investigation was absolutely thorough and we covered every angle.’

Miss Uttley has written repeatedly to Lord Cullen demanding explanation to her claims. Most of her letters were answered by inquiry clerk Glynis McKeand, who said witnesses were selected by the Crown, not by the judge.

7 Responses to “I blame police sex ring for conspiracy of silence over the Dunblane massacre”

  1. 1
    Labour25 Says:

    […] covered up abuse allegations against the man responsible for the Dunblane school massacre,"…lane-massacre/ Last edited by L= (1/2) d v2 s CL; Today at 12:00 AM. I may be in the gutter but when I look […]

  2. 2
    George Ballantay Says:

    Masonic cover up

  3. 3
    Treason and The Right To Keep And Bear Arms | Iceni Rising Says:

    […]… […]

  4. 4
    Chris Says:

    I believe it was a cover up but also to suite the agenda of the government to tighten gun laws. I’m not gonna go in t too much detail because people will think I’m nuts but that major shake up of gun laws, the complete ban on hand guns, just because some nutcase losses it and kills a heap of ting children. Also the reports of more than one gunman wearing balaclavas/masks. False flag is a new word, well one I’ve only recently discovered, but it’s been alive and well for a long time

  5. 5
    SMART ALEC EXPOSES HIMSELF | Psalm79:9+10 Says:

    […] 2. Dunblane massacre. […]

  6. 6
    Matthew Hewitt Says:

    The gun ownership issue is a complete red herring; Britain is not America and does not, and never has had, the same type of gun culture and associated pressure groups. The outcome of the inquiry and the changes in legislation were simply done in an attempt to demonstrate new safeguarding and to divert attention away from the real issues of institutional corruption and child abuse at the heart of the case.

    The post-Dunblane gun legislation isn’t anywhere near as Draconian as what the general public seem to believe. It only really changed the cost involved in owning firearms; having to purchase a separate licence for each weapon means that the sport is now beyond the financial reach of most citizens, but the vast majority were never interested in the first place. Shooting (by and large) is and always has been the province of the upper-class and super-wealthy and from their points of view, nothing much has actually changed. Ironically (or perhaps not), these are the very people who the Thomas Hamilton’s and Jimmy Saville’s of the world were supplying to and procuring for.

  7. 7
    John Richardson Says:

    The Chief Constable of Tayside blamed it on it being connected to a masonic group.
    This was never proved and a senior member of the Scottish Masonic Lodge had threats in the lobby of the house of lords if she continued to ask questions on the matter.
    Has the Chief Constable of Tayside been nobbled by the Scottish Law Lords ?

Leave a Reply